Custom Query (2152 matches)
Results (151 - 153 of 2152)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1037 | fixed | More Robust Harvesting for DGU | amercader | thejimmyg |
Description |
CKAN's harvesting facility is now live on DGU but there are some major improvements that could be made to make it more robust and better fit the generic CKAN harvesting framework proposed in #987. Some of the key issues:
|
|||
#1046 | fixed | Dictization and the new logic layer | kindly | thejimmyg |
Description |
The stages involved with doing this.
|
|||
#1094 | duplicate | [super] Refactor the Auth System | thejimmyg | thejimmyg |
Description |
Here are some proposed changes related to CKAN's authorization system - they aren't very big, but should provide for some forthcoming use cases including #787. Two man reasons for the changes are:
The first two changes revolve around the is_authorized method, which is called by the logic layer to ask whether a particular user (e.g. Bob) is allowed to do a certain action (e.g. edit) on a certain object (e.g. Package).
which *overrides* the current call with its own implementation (note: in previous discussions we have considered allowing a chain of plugins, no longer!) Reason: authorization can be completely delegated to another system (or partially)
but for action=create_package, the object supplied is System, and for action=edit the object supplied is the package. Instead action should always be the string name of a function in the logic layer and object should always be the object passed to that function. This means our auth system is based around the actual actions we are performing (rather than a model them) and with the actual data that forms the action (rather than a related object). You never need a System object in this model.
Although this sounds a bit radical we already have auth extensions. Read-only CKAN Web UI(Additional requirement from #764) Whilse using CKAN web interface, you are not tempted to edit stuff:
|