<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CKAN: Ticket #1123: Please re-package CKAN packages as "noarch"</title>
    <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
... or, if the CKAN packages do contain architecture-specific binary code, build packages for i386 too.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Currently, &lt;a class="ext-link" href="http://apt-alpha.ckan.org/debian"&gt;&lt;span class="icon"&gt;​&lt;/span&gt;http://apt-alpha.ckan.org/debian&lt;/a&gt; only offers packages for amd64, but e.g. "m1.small" EC2 instances are i386.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We would need this in order to migrate the community instances to a packaged based CKAN.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Rufus, pls prioritise.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
    <generator>Trac 0.12.3</generator>
    <item>
      
        <dc:creator>nils.toedtmann</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>owner, status changed</title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:1</guid>
      <description>
          &lt;ul&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;owner&lt;/strong&gt;
              changed from &lt;em&gt;thejimmyg&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;dread&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;status&lt;/strong&gt;
                changed from &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;assigned&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
          &lt;/ul&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item><item>
      
        <dc:creator>dread</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title></title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:2</guid>
      <description>
        &lt;p&gt;
I'll change the architecture to "all" as per this article:
&lt;a class="ext-link" href="http://linuxreviews.org/man/deb-control/"&gt;&lt;span class="icon"&gt;​&lt;/span&gt;http://linuxreviews.org/man/deb-control/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item><item>
      
        <dc:creator>thejimmyg</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>status changed; resolution set</title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:3</guid>
      <description>
          &lt;ul&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;status&lt;/strong&gt;
                changed from &lt;em&gt;assigned&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;closed&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;resolution&lt;/strong&gt;
                set to &lt;em&gt;wontfix&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
          &lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;
This isn't necessarily a trivial thing. Let's get the build system for the packages stable before we start changing it all to support alternative architectures. Once the packaging is working well it would be trivial to switch those servers to amd64.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I'm sorry, but this isn't worth the investment in manpower at the moment.
&lt;/p&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item><item>
      
        <dc:creator>rgrp</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title></title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:4</guid>
      <description>
        &lt;p&gt;
You can't get small amazon instances as 64 bit and many people's own machines are 32 bit. How costly is packaging no-arch exactly (it must be more than a simple 'switch' in the build if you are saying this is costly :-) )
&lt;/p&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item><item>
      
        <dc:creator>nils.toedtmann</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:36:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>status changed; resolution deleted</title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:5</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:5</guid>
      <description>
          &lt;ul&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;status&lt;/strong&gt;
                changed from &lt;em&gt;closed&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;reopened&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;resolution&lt;/strong&gt;
                &lt;em&gt;wontfix&lt;/em&gt; deleted
            &lt;/li&gt;
          &lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;
Looks like the packages on apt.okfn.org are now architecture "all" - great.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To avoid future confusion, i change this ticket's solution to "fixed".
&lt;/p&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item><item>
      
        <dc:creator>nils.toedtmann</dc:creator>

      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>status changed; resolution set</title>
      <link>http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:6</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ticket/1123#comment:6</guid>
      <description>
          &lt;ul&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;status&lt;/strong&gt;
                changed from &lt;em&gt;reopened&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;closed&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
            &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;resolution&lt;/strong&gt;
                set to &lt;em&gt;fixed&lt;/em&gt;
            &lt;/li&gt;
          &lt;/ul&gt;
      </description>
      <category>Ticket</category>
    </item>
 </channel>
</rss>