http://localhost/ticket/1424 <p> ckan-discuss discussion suggests changes to the 'openness' indicator ( <a class="ext-link" href="http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/2011-October/001786.html"><span class="icon">​</span>http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/2011-October/001786.html</a> ) </p> <p> Dataset view page: </p> <ul><li>If there is an explicit but non-OKD compliant license, such as CC-BY-NC, then this should be stated explicitly, perhaps: “This dataset is Not Open. License: Creative Commons Attribution Noncommerical. This is not an open license as it does not meet the Open Knowledge Definition.” </li><li>If the license is marked as “Other::License Not Specified”, then this should be stated explicitly, perhaps: “This dataset is Not Open. It is published without an explicit license, the publisher reserves all rights to the dataset.” </li><li>3. If the license field was left empty by the contributor of the Data Hub record, then again this should be stated explicitly, perhaps: “This dataset is Not Open. The license of this dataset is unknown or unspecified. Start an enquiry on <a class="missing wiki">IsItOpenData?</a> » </li><li>There is a bug so that non-open licenses doesn't have an openness notice. </li><li>If downloadable resources are not available, this should not affect 'openness' - check this has been removed. </li></ul> en-us http://assets.okfn.org/p/ckan/img/ckan_logo_shortname.png http://localhost/ticket/1424 Trac 0.12.3