CKAN: Ticket #2209: Object->RDF mapping

description changed

ross — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:06:33 GMT

description modified (diff)

description changed

ross — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:58:08 GMT

description modified (diff)

ross — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:20:39 GMT

Option 4 is the most appealing at this point, although you probably should look at #2209

ross — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:21:14 GMT

Previous comment should read:

Option 4 is the most appealing at this point, although you probably should look at #1649

ross — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:19:30 GMT

Current thinking is that option 4 is a default (as per ckanext-rdf) rdf output that is generated not in code (as currently) but using a genshi xml template to read the package into an RDF format (as if it were HTML). This would then be overrideable so that for ecportal where the format of the RDF is different (change of vocabs etc) we can just point the config to a new template.

Pros:

Easy to implement Easy to use Not hard-coded as currently Fast execution

Cons:

Requires knowledge of required RDF output if default is not useful RDF and not any of the other formats yet. Only works with package/resource/tags unless more work is done

ross — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:13 GMT

Can't edit comments .. so

Pros:

Easy to implement

Easy to use

Not hard-coded as currently

Fast execution

Cons:

Requires knowledge of required RDF output if default is not useful RDF and not any of the other formats yet. Only works with package/resource/tags unless more work is done

description changed

ross — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:13:16 GMT

description modified (diff)

keywords changed

ross — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:24:34 GMT

keywords [?d][a:1.5d][r:0.5d] added; [?d] removed

keywords, status changed; resolution set

ross — Wed, 09 May 2012 12:20:51 GMT

keywords [?d][a:2.0d] added; [?d][a:1.5d][r:0.5d] removed
status changed from new to closed
resolution set to fixed