Changes between Initial Version and Version 3 of Ticket #226


Ignore:
Timestamp:
07/14/10 09:02:46 (4 years ago)
Author:
rgrp
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #226

    • Property Owner changed from rgrp to nickstenning
    • Property Milestone changed from to v1.1

  • Ticket #226 – Description

    initial v3  
    11Repository History [/revision] 
    22 * What is this page called? "Recent Changes", "Repository History", "/revision": standardise. Between the link in the nav and the page <title> particularly, but the route is also important. Perhaps /changes or something similar? 
    3  * needs copyediting. 
    4  * Pagination has similar issues to elsewhere. Also, most obvious here, is the fact that we don't need to display a link to every possible page. Please can we limit it to, say, a dozen nearby pages and an ellipsis. 
    5  * Without looking at dates, its not clear whether I'm seeing most recent or oldest changes. Change pagination to say "Older"/"More recent" rather than "Previous"/"Next". 
     3   * Will change page title on /revision/ to Revision History. Will not change route for the time being. 
     4 * ~~needs copyediting.~~ 
     5 * ~~Pagination has similar issues to elsewhere. Also, most obvious here, is the fact that we don't need to display a link to every possible page. Please can we limit it to, say, a dozen nearby pages and an ellipsis.~~ 
     6 * ~~Without looking at dates, its not clear whether I'm seeing most recent or oldest changes. Change pagination to say "Older"/"More recent" rather than "Previous"/"Next".~~ (wontfix: now have text saying we are showing most recent changes) 
    67 * Table layout is pretty ugly (yes, I'm aware this is my fault). 
     8   * wontfix - nothing better at the moment 
    79 * Timestamps are horribly unreadable. At the absolute minimum get rid of the micros. Hover for more detail?  
    810 * Can we link to an author page? Yes! 
    9  * Atom feed should have a feed icon! 
     11 * ~~Atom feed should have a feed icon!~~ 
    1012 * Why are we adding another <link rel="alternate"> to this page? We already have one for recent changes on every page in the site and the one we're adding has a less descriptive title. Which is correct? Use that one as a feed for every page.